3 Times a Charm – Petition on 407ETR Issues‏

Change the 407 Act supporters, this cause can really use your support right now. Please go to the Premier’s website and vote this policy idea up. If you have any positive suggestions, please post them there. This could go a long way to nipping this issue in the butt once and for all. Here’s the link http://commonground.ideascale.com/a/dtd/Change-the-407-Act!/13642-25935 Thank-you so much for sharing this and helping decision makers pay attention to this.
The group “Stop the 407ETR’s Abuse of Power” has refocused and started a new petition/campaign. https://www.change.org/petitions/change-the-407act
The group wants the 407Act changed so it is transparent & complies with other important public policies currently being ignored.  This company doesn’t deserve any special treatment.
“The Fixer” Jack Lakey is very special to the group because he has done fantastic work exposing this issue.  In 2010 Jack wrote an article that hit the head on the nail with respects to 407ETR issues. http://www.thestar.com/yourtoronto/the_fixer/2010/01/16/drivers_can_appeal_unpaid_hwy_407_bills.html
Neither MTO nor 407ETR are transparent in informing you of this right to independent arbitration & the independent arbitrators are not easily accessible.
According to Jodie Parmar, Section 19 of 407 Act creates the legal obligation for 407ETR to pay fees & expenses of appointed dispute arbitrators.  
When someone has a billing issue, they are pushed through 407ETR’s internal 3 tiered process. Which we all know gets you nowhere. The amounts are undocumented and 407 will not provide proof of charges i.e. they will not provide photographic evidence of tolls.  When the public realizes they have been hoodwinked & finds out about these independent arbitrators they are told they missed their 30 day window of opportunity to exercise their right to independent arbitration. Also, that they have exhausted all avenues so CASE CLOSED!
Nobody in the group or anyone is known to have been successful in #1 accessing the independent arbitrators and #2 successfully appealing.
Section 9 of the Regulation requires 407 ETR to advise the Registrar at any time if a person ought not to have received a notice under s. 16 of the Act due to error, payment, or 407 ETR’s failure to comply with the Act and Regulation.  At the same time, the owner must withdraw the s. 22 notice and request that the Registrar “not take the actions he or she would otherwise be required to take under subsection 22(4).  The problem is MTO interprets this to mean that unless 407ETR withdraws, they will still act on Plate Denials. 
In layman terms, the group says this is wrong for MTO to keep people in plate denial when 407ETR has issued a plate denial notice in error.
If you refer to the bottom of Jack’s article, he is pushing for answers and when asking questions about 407 appeals he was told that 407 appeal requests go on to Dispute Resolution Services.  Back then those services were operated by Cliff Hendler & Jack writes “Hendler said he couldn’t talk to us about the process without permission from the 407”.
Jodie Parmar questioned rightfully back in June of 2012 : why does LGIC-appointed dispute arbitrator need permission of 407ETR ? Both Jodie Parmar and the group claims MTO has mismanaged the 407Act & CGLA. 
The group need your support to change the 407Act so that it is transparent & complies with other important public policies currently being ignored.  Sign & share the petition https://www.change.org/petitions/change-the-407act
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: BlueHost Coupon | Compare CD Rates, Online Brokers and Press Release